From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35065) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VUVv6-0006sH-Cm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 02:09:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VUVv0-000458-Ga for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 02:09:52 -0400 Message-ID: <52579626.8020507@weilnetz.de> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 08:09:42 +0200 From: Stefan Weil MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1373228703-26226-1-git-send-email-sw@weilnetz.de> <037D60EF2A5746E468BF0A04@nimrod.local> <51DA438A.8060903@weilnetz.de> <5256FBE7.80207@weilnetz.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Spelling fixes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Alex Bligh , Corentin Chary , Jan Kiszka , Qemu-development List , QEMU Trivial , Anthony Liguori Am 11.10.2013 03:34, schrieb Peter Maydell: > On 11 October 2013 04:11, Stefan Weil wrote: >> Am 08.07.2013 17:14, schrieb Corentin Chary: >>> The comments (and most of the code) are from libvncserver (and, >>> earlier, from "THE 'ZYWRLE' VNC CODEC SOURCE CODE. " as described in >>> the header): >>> >>> http://fastdroid-vnc.googlecode.com/svn-history/r3/trunk/LibVNCServer-0.9.7/libvncserver/zywrletemplate.c >>> >> Then I suggest to apply my patch as it is. It fixes two locations and >> improves a third one a little bit. > Disagree. If we don't understand the intention of the original > author we should leave the text as is rather than changing it > in a way which might be incorrect. > > -- PMM - This lead us to more speed and less memory. - Of cause, the result of both method is quite same - because it's only difference that coefficient position. + This leads us to more speed and less memory. + Of course, the result of both methods is quite same + because its only difference is that coefficient position. Would you agree on fixing the first line only and removing the two following lines? Stefan