From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50877) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VW5C7-0005G6-AJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:02:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VW5By-0008EJ-TS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:01:55 -0400 Received: from mail-qc0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c01::236]:39947) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VW5By-0008EF-OH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:01:46 -0400 Received: by mail-qc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id n4so6138376qcx.27 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 07:01:46 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <525D4AC4.1000408@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 16:01:40 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1381762577-12526-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <87r4bnlbj6.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <20131015052816.GC16331@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/43] pci, pc, acpi fixes, enhancements List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Peter Maydell , marcel.a@redhat.com, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , qemu-devel , Gerd Hoffmann , Igor Mammedov Il 15/10/2013 15:51, Anthony Liguori ha scritto: > From 41/43: > > "The interface is actually backwards-compatible with > existing PIIX4 ACPI (though not migration compatible)." > > And does "AFAIK" translate to, "I have tested migration from new and > old and old and new with this series"? I suspect the answer is no. Since when do we support migration from new to old? Paolo