Re: [Qemu-devel] Should the i8259 devices remain no-user?

[Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>]

Il 16/10/2013 18:21, BALATON Zoltan ha scritto:
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 16/10/2013 11:51, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
>>> Let me try to elaborate, to make sure I understand.
>>>
>>> Unlike ordinary ISA devices, the i8259 devices need additional wiring,
>>> done by code.
>>>
>>> For instance, board code like pc_q35_init(), pc_piix.c's pc_init1(),
>>> mips_malta_init(), ... wire up their IRQ input lines.  The slave's IRQ
>>> output line is wired to the master's IRQ2 in hw/intc/i8259.c for
>>> isa-i8259, and the kernel for kvm-i8259.  The master's IRQ output line
>>> is wired up by board code (it's complicated).
>>>
>>> Correct?  If yes, I can turn it into a suitable comment.
>>
>> The wiring of the slave to the master is hardcoded into i8259 code.
> 
> A bit off topic but this reminded me of these patches:
> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/206753/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/208252/
> 
> which never got merged. Is there a chance that these fixes get merged
> sometimes or is there an explanation why it won't be fixed? As far as I
> remember the patches were reviewed and multiple versions were proposed
> but at the end no decision was reached on which one to merge and it was
> just left uncorrected.

Right, thank you very much.  ISTR the unanswered question was what to do
about migration, but I need to reread all the threads.

Paolo