From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37905) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VX6c5-00076Q-5h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 05:45:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VX6bz-0001MB-6b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 05:44:57 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:6680) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VX6by-0001Ly-PD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 05:44:51 -0400 Message-ID: <5261030B.3040804@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:44:43 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1382058681-14957-1-git-send-email-xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1382058681-14957-10-git-send-email-xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1382058681-14957-10-git-send-email-xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 09/13] error: print progname with error_vprintf() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Wenchao Xia Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, stefanha@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lcapitulino@redhat.com Il 18/10/2013 03:11, Wenchao Xia ha scritto: > This remove additional code path about where to print the error, > error_vprintf() is only the controller now, making future change > easier. > > The logic is not changed since when cur_mon = NULL, error_vprintf() > will still print to stderr. > > Signed-off-by: Wenchao Xia > --- > util/qemu-error.c | 11 ++++++++++- > 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/util/qemu-error.c b/util/qemu-error.c > index d1e858a..c29fcbd 100644 > --- a/util/qemu-error.c > +++ b/util/qemu-error.c > @@ -151,6 +151,15 @@ const char *error_get_progname(void) > return progname; > } > > +static void error_print_progname(const char *fmt, ...) > +{ > + va_list ap; > + > + va_start(ap, fmt); > + error_vprintf(fmt, ap); > + va_end(ap); > +} > + > /* > * Print current location to current monitor if we have one, else to stderr. > */ > @@ -161,7 +170,7 @@ static void error_print_loc(void) > const char *const *argp; > > if (!cur_mon && progname) { > - fprintf(stderr, "%s: ", progname); > + error_print_progname("%s: ", progname); > } > switch (cur_loc->kind) { > case LOC_CMDLINE: > I agree that using fprintf looks odd, but why not use error_printf directly? Paolo