From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43177)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1VXAZV-0002k1-OA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:58:42 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1VXAZN-0003RM-BP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:58:33 -0400
Received: from mail-ea0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c01::232]:39630)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1VXAZN-0003RD-2t
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:58:25 -0400
Received: by mail-ea0-f178.google.com with SMTP id a15so2041562eae.9
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 06:58:24 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <52613E7C.7060201@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 15:58:20 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1381233491-17019-1-git-send-email-pl@kamp.de>
	<1381233491-17019-15-git-send-email-pl@kamp.de>
	<20131018123812.GB19041@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com>
	<52612E47.9050004@redhat.com>
	<20131018132425.GA20105@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com>
	<52613D38.7000507@kamp.de>
In-Reply-To: <52613D38.7000507@kamp.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv4 14/17] block/get_block_status: fix
 BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO for unallocated blocks
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, ronniesahlberg@gmail.com, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws

Il 18/10/2013 15:52, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
> 
> Regarding putting this info into the BDI I am fine with that, but I
> would keep the wrapper functions.
> On the other hand, bdrv_has_zero_init is also not in the BDI... I had it
> in the BDI and got the request
> to move it to separate functions. To finish this series I need a
> definitive decision where to put it.

Moving bdrv_has_zero_init to BDI is also a good idea, but it can be done
later.

Paolo