From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38723) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZdVU-0000qB-QI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 05:16:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZdVL-0001H5-U7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 05:16:36 -0400 Received: from e28smtp07.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.7]:34311) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZdVL-0001FU-21 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 05:16:27 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp07.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 14:46:21 +0530 Received: from d28relay05.in.ibm.com (d28relay05.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.62]) by d28dlp03.in.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 373C51258017 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 14:46:53 +0530 (IST) Received: from d28av05.in.ibm.com (d28av05.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.67]) by d28relay05.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r9P9GE8N38011056 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 14:46:15 +0530 Received: from d28av05.in.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d28av05.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r9P9GHdT005834 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 14:46:17 +0530 Message-ID: <526A36DF.4000600@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 17:16:15 +0800 From: Wenchao Xia MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1382321765-29052-1-git-send-email-xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1382321765-29052-1-git-send-email-xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] qapi: generate event defines automatically List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Wenchao Xia , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com Hi, Markus I am coding V2 which support event in qapi-schema, and just remember it is on your TODO list. Is it OK to let me implement it instead as V2?