From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51495) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZj5q-0000fm-JY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:14:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZj5j-0004Y8-IN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:14:30 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:15053) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZj5j-0004Y4-Ap for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:14:23 -0400 Message-ID: <526A8AC5.6070308@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 16:14:13 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1382461164-8854-1-git-send-email-mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5266DE16.8060508@redhat.com> <52676BF6.7010305@redhat.com> <526A8840.5020303@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <526A8840.5020303@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] rdma: rename 'x-rdma' => 'rdma' List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael R. Hines" Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, quintela@redhat.com, chegu_vinod@hp.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, owasserm@redhat.com, onom@us.ibm.com, abali@us.ibm.com, mrhines@us.ibm.com, gokul@us.ibm.com Il 25/10/2013 16:03, Michael R. Hines ha scritto: > > Well, I tried posting libvirt support with this naming scheme, > but they didn't accepted. > > Their reason (Daniel, I think) is valid: experimental implies that it > shouldn't be exposed in the management software until it is > deemed stable at some point. > > As far we can tell, it is stable, and made very clear using the new > 'setup' state in the migration state machine. Sure, x-rdma => rdma *is* stable. I'm not sure about x-rdma-pin-all though. Paolo