From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@amazon.com>,
"Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:45:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52726D22.709@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+aC4ktagR=BSHCk11dMqfjhfiEOAv=D=9VVqj=mXkyM35FQFA@mail.gmail.com>
Am 31.10.2013 15:39, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
>> Am 31.10.2013 15:31, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>>> On 31 October 2013 14:18, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
>>>> Peter, since I had picked up the first two patches into my still pending
>>>> qom-next pull, as per the QEMU Summit discussion those patches should've
>>>> gotten an Acked-by.
>>>
>>> Hmm? I don't recall this part of the discussion. If you want the
>>> patches to have an Acked-by from you you need to send mail
>>> to the list with an Acked-by line.
>>
>> No, I added a Signed-off-by. It was clearly stated that a Reviewed-by
>> needs to be explicitly sent as reply but that "looks okay" should in
>> exactly such a case where sender=submaintainer should be recorded as
>> Acked-by, and Sob is certainly stronger than Acked-by. Cf. minutes.
>
> Nope. If you want there to be an Acked-by, say "Acked-by:". Don't
> make people infer your Acked-bys.
Yes, that's in the minutes. And yes, that's what I got as answer there.
Please reply to the minutes if you think otherwise.
I brought up exactly this situation where I am contributor to CPU and
submaintainer of CPU and often not getting Reviewed-bys but if at all,
such as from Paolo recently, some verbal "looks OK" for a series. I was
told that that should be turned into an Acked-by on the patches to
satisfy your criteria that contributors may not just send patches as
pull without Reviewed-by.
> And adding tags is a nice-to-have. There is no "rule" stating that
> you must include everyone that appears on the mailing list. But I
> expect that maintainers try to
Again, at QEMU Summit you pushed for making Reviewed-by a must-have and
we discussed whether a submaintainer must add a Reviewed-by then and
what to do if author==submaintainer. If you dropped that thought, then
fine with me.
Regards,
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-31 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-25 18:07 [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue Peter Maydell
2013-10-25 18:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 1/6] hw/arm/boot: Make user not specifying a kernel not an error Peter Maydell
2013-10-25 18:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 2/6] hw/arm: Tidy up conditional calls to arm_load_kernel Peter Maydell
2013-10-25 18:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 3/6] target-arm: Add CP15 VBAR support Peter Maydell
2013-10-25 18:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 4/6] target-arm: sort TCG cpreg list by KVM-style 64 bit ID number Peter Maydell
2013-10-25 18:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 5/6] target-arm: fix sorting issue of KVM cpreg list Peter Maydell
2013-10-25 18:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 6/6] integrator: fix Linux boot failure by emulating dbg region Peter Maydell
2013-10-31 14:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue Edgar E. Iglesias
2013-10-31 14:18 ` Andreas Färber
2013-10-31 14:21 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-10-31 14:31 ` Peter Maydell
2013-10-31 14:36 ` Andreas Färber
2013-10-31 14:39 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-10-31 14:45 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2013-10-31 14:54 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-10-31 15:04 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-10-31 16:52 ` Andreas Färber
2013-10-31 16:54 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-10-31 17:10 ` Andreas Färber
2013-10-31 17:02 ` Peter Maydell
2013-10-31 17:15 ` Peter Maydell
2013-10-31 18:55 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-10-31 15:16 ` Peter Maydell
2013-10-31 17:14 ` Andreas Färber
2013-10-31 17:18 ` Peter Maydell
2013-10-31 17:27 ` Andreas Färber
2013-10-31 17:51 ` Peter Maydell
2013-10-31 18:58 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-10-31 22:13 ` Edgar E. Iglesias
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-03-19 12:05 Peter Maydell
2014-03-19 13:33 ` Peter Maydell
2016-07-07 13:48 Peter Maydell
2016-07-11 10:16 ` Peter Maydell
2018-07-30 14:17 Peter Maydell
2018-07-30 18:11 ` Peter Maydell
2018-10-29 15:34 Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52726D22.709@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=aliguori@amazon.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=edgar.iglesias@gmail.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).