From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: pkrempa@redhat.com, lersek@redhat.com, marcel.a@redhat.com,
libvir-list@redhat.com, Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, rhod@redhat.com,
kraxel@redhat.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws, lcapitulino@redhat.com,
afaerber@suse.de
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] pvpanic plans?
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:26:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52727695.8080007@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131031150955.GE9948@redhat.com>
Il 31/10/2013 16:09, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:56:42PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 31/10/2013 15:52, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>>>>> Yes, it does.
>>> What does it break exactly?
>>
>> The point of a panicked event is to examine the guest at a particular
>> moment in time (e.g. host-initiated crash dump). If you let the guest
>> run, it may reboot and prevent you from getting a meaningful dump.
>
> Well we trust guest anyway, so I think we can trust it to call halt.
No, we cannot. Reboot-in-guest-after-dump-on-host is a perfectly fine
configuration.
>>>>> But I think that, once we make the pvpanic device is
>>>>> optional, to a large extent there is no bug. Adding the pvpanic
>>>>> device to the VM will make libvirt obey <oncrash> instead of the
>>>>> in-guest setting, and that's it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Two months have passed and no casualties have been reported due to
>>>>> pvpanic. Let's just remove the auto-pvpanic from all machine types in
>>>>> 1.7 (yes, that's backwards incompatible in a strict sense), document
>>>>> it in the release notes, and hope that the old QEMU versions with
>>>>> mandatory pvpanic die of old age.
>>>
>>> Nod. I'm fine with that.
>>>
>>> I think we still need to do get rid of the PANICKED state somehow.
>>> If we can't replace it with RUNNING state, let's replace it with PAUSED.
>>>
>>> For example, you can't continue from panicked for some reason.
>>> You can't do a reset. But you can pause and then continue.
>>
>> We need to keep the PANICKED state, but we can make it a normal
>> "resumable" state.
>
> If it's resumable how is it different from PAUSED?
If the guest panics while for some reason libvirtd went down, libvirt
can see what happened. It is similar to the "I/O error" state in this
respect.
> Looks like all transitions from paused state should be allowed from panicked
> state. So why keep it separate?
Because you can poll for the state instead of watching an event.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-31 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-22 16:10 [Qemu-devel] pvpanic plans? Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-22 16:44 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-08-22 17:53 ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-08-22 18:25 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-08-27 8:42 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2013-08-22 19:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-22 20:09 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-08-22 20:36 ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-08-22 20:39 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-08-23 8:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-22 21:08 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-27 8:06 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2013-08-27 13:08 ` Ronen Hod
2013-08-27 13:20 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2013-08-27 13:26 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-08-27 13:57 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2013-08-27 13:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] " Daniel P. Berrange
2013-08-27 13:17 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-08-27 13:21 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2013-08-22 17:15 ` [Qemu-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2013-08-22 18:33 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-08-22 19:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2013-08-22 19:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-22 19:41 ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-08-22 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] " Eric Blake
2013-10-24 2:39 ` [Qemu-devel] " Hu Tao
2013-10-29 16:01 ` Markus Armbruster
2013-10-31 14:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-10-31 14:32 ` Eric Blake
2013-10-31 14:34 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-10-31 14:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-10-31 14:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-10-31 14:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-10-31 15:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-10-31 15:26 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-10-31 15:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-10-31 15:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-10-31 16:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-10-31 16:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-10-31 16:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-10-31 16:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-10-31 16:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-10-31 16:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-10-31 17:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-10-31 17:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-10-31 17:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-10-31 17:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-10-31 17:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-10-31 18:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-10-31 16:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-10-31 14:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-10-31 14:49 ` Eric Blake
2013-10-31 15:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-11-04 9:25 ` Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52727695.8080007@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=hutao@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel.a@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pkrempa@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rhod@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).