From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] block/drive-mirror: Check for NULL backing_hd
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 11:53:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5278CE21.5030204@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1383611706-22107-1-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com>
Il 05/11/2013 01:35, Max Reitz ha scritto:
> It should be possible to execute the QMP "drive-mirror" command in
> "none" sync mode and "absolute-paths" mode even for block devices
> lacking a backing file.
>
> "absolute-paths" does in fact not require a backing file to be present,
> as can be seen from the "top" sync mode code path. "top" basically
> states that the device should indeed have a backing file - however, the
> current code catches the case if it doesn't and then simply treats it as
> "full" sync mode, creating a target image without a backing file (in
> "absolute-paths" mode). Thus, "absolute-paths" does not imply the target
> file must indeed have a backing file.
>
> Therefore, the target file may be left unbacked in case of "none" sync
> mode as well, if the specified device is not backed either. Currently,
> qemu will crash trying to dereference the backing file pointer since it
> assumes that it will always be non-NULL in that case ("none" with
> "absolute-paths").
>
> The first patch in this series adds a check whether the specified block
> device is backed or not (creating an unbacked target image, if required);
> the second patch adds a test case for mirroring unbacked block devices.
>
>
> Max Reitz (2):
> block/drive-mirror: Check for NULL backing_hd
> qemu-iotests: Add test for unbacked mirroring
>
> blockdev.c | 4 +-
> tests/qemu-iotests/070 | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/qemu-iotests/070.out | 33 +++++++++++++++++
> tests/qemu-iotests/group | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> create mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests/070
> create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/070.out
>
Patch 1 is fine.
For patch 2, there are existing drive-mirror tests written in Python.
I'll let the maintainers whether they are fine with a new test, or
prefer to extend those with a new testcase.
Paolo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-05 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-05 0:35 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] block/drive-mirror: Check for NULL backing_hd Max Reitz
2013-11-05 0:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] " Max Reitz
2013-11-05 3:32 ` Fam Zheng
2013-11-05 19:06 ` Max Reitz
2013-11-05 0:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] qemu-iotests: Add test for unbacked mirroring Max Reitz
2013-11-05 9:00 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-11-05 19:08 ` Max Reitz
2013-11-05 10:53 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5278CE21.5030204@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).