From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37432) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VdmLU-0003QH-Dx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 14:31:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VdmLP-0007Hm-E2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 14:31:24 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:39198 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VdmLP-0007Hh-8P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 14:31:19 -0500 Message-ID: <52794784.2020304@suse.de> Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 20:31:16 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-1.7] configure: Explicitly set ARFLAGS so we can build with GNU Make 4.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Ken Moffat , qemu-devel , Anthony Liguori , "patches@linaro.org" Am 05.11.2013 20:09, schrieb Peter Maydell: > On 5 November 2013 18:45, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: >> Am 05.11.2013 19:04, schrieb Peter Maydell: >>> Ping! >> >> A typo in the commit message has been reported >=20 > What typo? Alex sent a reply claiming that there was > a missing space in the subject but that appears to be > entirely his email client's problem, since as you can > see from this mail and also in Linaro's patchwork > http://patches.linaro.org/21203/ there is a space there. > (I would link to the qemu patchwork but it seems to > be down right now.) Looks like you're right. You replying to his claim would've helped. ;) >> , and it has been >> requested to add Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org. >=20 > I don't think there's any need to respin a patch > just because somebody thinks it might be worth > applying to stable. Point is, if you are ping'ing Anthony to apply this with his fully-automated patches tool, then he won't add the Cc and in turn it will unlikely be backported to 1.6.2. The response I got at QEMU Summit was that it is both the contributor's and the submaintainer's responsibility to add the Cc to the commit message. But maybe you're going to tell me that I misunderstood that as well... Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=BC= rnberg