From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55702)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1Vfp2V-0002F9-4Y
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 05:48:23 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1Vfp2M-00039p-I3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 05:48:15 -0500
Received: from mail-qe0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c02::22e]:35450)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1Vfp2M-00039d-Dh
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 05:48:06 -0500
Received: by mail-qe0-f46.google.com with SMTP id s14so4193339qeb.5
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 02:48:05 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5280B5DD.5080504@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:47:57 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1384125313-5578-1-git-send-email-airlied@gmail.com>
	<CA+aC4kt9+QSg1je=PnYjYf+2Kdv-ganEb3Rr-OxVDcebiEM8Ow@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPM=9tyyMH5pu-pEMBVMHY7uzT0DHGCgv5RLY_yYQuvYwuLYvg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPM=9tyyMH5pu-pEMBVMHY7uzT0DHGCgv5RLY_yYQuvYwuLYvg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ui/sdl2 : initial port to SDL 2.0
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>

Il 11/11/2013 10:10, Dave Airlie ha scritto:
>> > It's very hard to review ATM due to the split.
> No I talked to enough people at kvmforum and everyone said I should
> split this into a separate file, please don't make me undo that now, I
> originally did it with ifdefs and just spent a few days redoing it the
> other way!
> 

You can try using options for git format-patch like -C10
--find-copies-harder.

Paolo