qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] audit needed for signal handlers
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:22:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52811265.5070803@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_3e5RK2Dz2D6x3mGnE+MZ6BohLVtkiUJ+_ktz5dASNcg@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1104 bytes --]

On 11/11/2013 10:13 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 11 November 2013 17:05, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>> That said, aren't all signals in QEMU (except SIG_IPI) caught with
>> signalfd and the handlers run synchronously in the iothread?
> 
> Eric specifically points out one which is not.
> (I'm pretty sure that 'reinstall signal handler at
> end of signal handler' is ancient voodoo that we don't
> want either, incidentally.)

Reinstalling the signal handler is voodoo needed only for systems where
SA_RESETHAND is the default behavior of signal() (POSIX says that the
older signal() is implementation-defined whether it behaves like
SA_RESETHAND|SA_NODEFER [SysV] or SA_RESTART [BSD] - so it is already
mandatory to use sigaction() if you don't want to be bitten by the
difference in semantics; but if you can assume working sigaction(), then
don't use signal() or SA_RESETHAND in the first place, and you don't
need the reinstall voodoo in your handlers).

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 621 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-11 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-11 16:50 [Qemu-devel] audit needed for signal handlers Eric Blake
2013-11-11 16:56 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-11-11 17:03   ` Eric Blake
2013-11-11 17:05   ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-11 17:08     ` Eric Blake
2013-11-11 17:11       ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-11 17:13     ` Peter Maydell
2013-11-11 17:22       ` Eric Blake [this message]
2013-11-11 17:47       ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-12  8:18         ` Gerd Hoffmann
2013-11-12 12:07         ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-11-11 17:11   ` Peter Maydell
2013-11-11 18:03 ` Max Filippov
2013-11-12 12:24   ` Laszlo Ersek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52811265.5070803@redhat.com \
    --to=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).