From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34075)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1VgWlz-0002g7-QZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 04:30:16 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1VgWlr-0001o8-FL
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 04:30:07 -0500
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5283468F.6030304@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:29:51 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1384155875-26999-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru>	<1384155875-26999-5-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru>	<5280D061.50802@suse.de>	<20131111152546.4be13e10@thinkpad>	<52816D26.3070708@ozlabs.ru>
	<20131112105837.63c831e6@thinkpad> <5282217F.3050401@ozlabs.ru>
	<528222D8.5020606@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <528222D8.5020606@suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/6] qemu-option: support +foo/-foo
	command line agruments
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>

Il 12/11/2013 13:45, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
>> > Heh. I do not understand movements in the qemu project most of the time
>> > :) I thought I could have added "compat" to PowerPC CPU as others did
>> > but I was so wrong :)
> Hey, I instructed you how to do exactly that, with a const char *
> argument, but you chose rather to experiment more with QemuOpts. ;)
> Don't blame us! :-)

At least you had a healthy dose of smileys! :)  (Me too, apparently).

I like Alexey's idea.

Paolo