From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46850) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vjfmn-0001cz-SN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 20:44:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vjfme-0002wd-V7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 20:43:57 -0500 Received: from e23smtp01.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.143]:45114) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vjfme-0002wV-5S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 20:43:48 -0500 Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp01.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 11:43:39 +1000 Received: from d23relay05.au.ibm.com (d23relay05.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.152]) by d23dlp03.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2023578050 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:43:36 +1100 (EST) Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (d23av04.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.139]) by d23relay05.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id rAM1Pbq47864676 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:25:38 +1100 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id rAM1hZZm012347 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:43:35 +1100 Message-ID: <528EB6C6.8090900@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 09:43:34 +0800 From: Wenchao Xia MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Is there any new progress or plans about "ram live snapshot feature"? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Zhanghailiang , "stefanha@gmail.com" , "phrdina@redhat.com" Cc: Dingweiping , Luonengjun , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "Huangpeng (Peter)" 于 2013/11/21 19:02, Zhanghailiang 写道: > Hi, > > Now qemu ram live snapshot feature has some problems, it is based on > ‘ram live migration’. > > The time of snapshot depends on completion time of migration, which is > not measurable. Also It may can’t achieve migrate in some situation. > > I have seen discussion about that in your previous emails, and there > seems to be a feasible scheme. > > I want to know if there is any new progress or somebody is trying to > realize the program. > > Best Regards > > Hailiang Zhang > Hi, Pavel Are you going to implement this feat? If no I'd like to add it in my TODO list.