From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38847)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <phrdina@redhat.com>) id 1Vjm5d-0007kr-1P
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 03:27:55 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <phrdina@redhat.com>) id 1Vjm5X-0005Ob-2K
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 03:27:48 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34186)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <phrdina@redhat.com>) id 1Vjm5W-0005OV-QU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 03:27:42 -0500
Message-ID: <528F1570.5010609@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 09:27:28 +0100
From: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <D1BD20B5DB34024DA951CEEE6C4C59985960E00D@szxema505-mbs.china.huawei.com>
	<528EB6C6.8090900@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <528EB6C6.8090900@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Is there any new progress or plans about "ram live
 snapshot feature"?
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Wenchao Xia <xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>, "stefanha@gmail.com" <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: Dingweiping <weiping.ding@huawei.com>, Luonengjun <luonengjun@huawei.com>, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, "Huangpeng (Peter)" <peter.huangpeng@huawei.com>

On 22.11.2013 02:43, Wenchao Xia wrote:
> =E4=BA=8E 2013/11/21 19:02, Zhanghailiang =E5=86=99=E9=81=93:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Now qemu ram live snapshot feature has some problems, it is based on
>> =E2=80=98ram live migration=E2=80=99.
>>
>> The time of snapshot depends on completion time of migration, which is
>> not measurable. Also It may can=E2=80=99t achieve migrate in some situ=
ation.
>>
>> I have seen discussion about that in your previous emails, and there
>> seems to be a feasible scheme.
>>
>> I want to know if there is any new progress or somebody is trying to
>> realize the program.
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Hailiang Zhang
>>
> Hi, Pavel
>    Are you going to implement this feat? If no I'd like to add it in my
> TODO list.
>

Hi all,

I'm planning to implement this, but still I have a lot of other work
TODO.

Pavel