From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40002)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1VkvjQ-0007MZ-S1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 07:57:47 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1VkvjK-0004SP-JZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 07:57:40 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50638)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1VkvjK-0004SK-Ai
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 07:57:34 -0500
Message-ID: <5293492D.3050607@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 13:57:17 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1385001528-12003-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com>
	<1385001528-12003-9-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1385001528-12003-9-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 08/27] dimm: implement dimm device
	abstraction
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com, mjt@tls.msk.ru, stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, stefanha@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com, quintela@redhat.com, chegu_vinod@hp.com, kraxel@redhat.com, aliguori@amazon.com, hutao@cn.fujitsu.com, marcel.a@redhat.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de

Il 21/11/2013 03:38, Igor Mammedov ha scritto:
> +static void dimm_initfn(Object *obj)
> +{
> +    object_property_add(obj, "memdev", "string", dimm_get_memdev,
> +                        dimm_set_memdev, NULL, NULL, NULL);

Perhaps, instead of relying on memory_region_owner, you could have
separate pointers for the MemoryBackend* and MemoryRegion*.  Then this
property could be a link<MemoryBackend> type (it looks like a link, and
quacks like a link).

Paolo

> +    object_property_add(obj, "size", "int", dimm_get_size,
> +                        NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> +}
> +