From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54338) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vlzqd-0007Jy-U8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 06:33:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VlzqU-0001LN-3w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 06:33:31 -0500 Received: from mail-bk0-f47.google.com ([209.85.214.47]:49254) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VlzqT-0001LB-Tn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 06:33:22 -0500 Received: by mail-bk0-f47.google.com with SMTP id mx12so3760444bkb.34 for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 03:33:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <529729FD.3030901@cloudius-systems.com> Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 13:33:17 +0200 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5294BC3B.6070902@redhat.com> <5297050E.6000700@redhat.com> <20131128091903.GA4609@kernel.org> <5297118C.3050104@cloudius-systems.com> <529712A1.8090207@redhat.com> <5297181B.3090109@cloudius-systems.com> <52971D86.60601@redhat.com> <20131128110915.GD5822@minantech.com> <529724B0.80405@redhat.com> <20131128112348.GF5822@minantech.com> <52972991.1050407@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <52972991.1050407@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] create a single workqueue for each vm to update vm irq routing table List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini , Gleb Natapov Cc: "Huangweidong (C)" , KVM , Gleb Natapov , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , "Zhanghaoyu (A)" , Luonengjun , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Zanghongyong , Avi Kivity , "Jinxin (F)" On 11/28/2013 01:31 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 28/11/2013 12:23, Gleb Natapov ha scritto: >>>>>> Unless what ? :) Unless reader is scheduled out? >>>> Yes. Or unless my brain is scheduled out in the middle of a sentence. >>>> >> So we will have to disable preemption in a reader to prevent big latencies for >> a writer, no? > I don't think that's necessary. The writer itself could also be > scheduled out, and the reader critical sections are really small. Let's > wait for Zhang to try SRCU and report back. > I think readers have preemption disabled already in that context (irqfd writes).