From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45279) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vm6AM-0001kV-5J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 13:18:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vm6AG-00055I-PH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 13:18:18 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:25287) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vm6AG-000552-I1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 13:18:12 -0500 Message-ID: <529788E1.103@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 19:18:09 +0100 From: Laszlo Ersek MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1385662155-15212-1-git-send-email-lersek@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1385662155-15212-1-git-send-email-lersek@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] i440fx-test: check firmware visibility List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= On 11/28/13 19:09, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > Changes in v2: > - Rebased ("-display none" is the default now). > > - I looked into memory management prudence in qtest, and I can see that > we don't care about leaking small objects at all. (See for example > qpci_device_foreach(), which calls qpci_device_find() in a loop, and > leaks the retval every time.) Sorry, last sentence missing: "Which is why I didn't try to plug such leaks in my series." NB: If I don't get feedback for this, I'm dropping it. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/240173/focus=241207 Thanks Laszlo