qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
	Eduardo Habkost <eduardo@habkost.net>,
	Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
	Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
	Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Cc: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
	"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
	"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Ilya Leoshkevich" <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Cleber Rosa" <crosa@redhat.com>,
	"Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" <wainersm@redhat.com>,
	"Beraldo Leal" <bleal@redhat.com>,
	"Pierre Morel" <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v22 15/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology polarization
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 11:02:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <529821b9-71f1-a137-172a-e697feaf6abd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230901155812.2696560-16-nsg@linux.ibm.com>

On 01/09/2023 17.58, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
> From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> Polarization is changed on a request from the guest.
> Let's verify the polarization is accordingly set by QEMU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> Co-developed-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   tests/avocado/s390_topology.py | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/avocado/s390_topology.py b/tests/avocado/s390_topology.py
> index 3a54fe2e00..d7ee36cb89 100644
> --- a/tests/avocado/s390_topology.py
> +++ b/tests/avocado/s390_topology.py
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ class S390CPUTopology(QemuSystemTest):
>       The polarization is changed on a request from the guest.
>       """
>       timeout = 90
> +    event_timeout = 10
>   
>       KERNEL_COMMON_COMMAND_LINE = ('printk.time=0 '
>                                     'root=/dev/ram '
> @@ -103,6 +104,14 @@ def kernel_init(self):
>                            '-initrd', initrd_path,
>                            '-append', kernel_command_line)
>   
> +    def system_init(self):
> +        self.log.info("System init")
> +        exec_command_and_wait_for_pattern(self,
> +                """ mount proc -t proc /proc;
> +                    mount sys -t sysfs /sys;
> +                    /bin/cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/dispatching """,

Is the /bin/ prefix really required here?

> +                    '0')
> +
>       def test_single(self):
>           """
>           This test checks the simplest topology with a single CPU.
> @@ -198,3 +207,39 @@ def test_hotplug_full(self):
>           self.check_topology(3, 1, 1, 1, 'high', False)
>           self.check_topology(4, 1, 1, 1, 'medium', False)
>           self.check_topology(5, 2, 1, 1, 'high', True)
> +
> +
> +    def guest_set_dispatching(self, dispatching):
> +        exec_command(self,
> +                f'echo {dispatching} > /sys/devices/system/cpu/dispatching')
> +        self.vm.event_wait('CPU_POLARIZATION_CHANGE', self.event_timeout)
> +        exec_command_and_wait_for_pattern(self,
> +                '/bin/cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/dispatching', dispatching)

dito?

> +
> +    def test_polarization(self):
> +        """
> +        This test verifies that QEMU modifies the entitlement change after
> +        several guest polarization change requests.
> +
> +        :avocado: tags=arch:s390x
> +        :avocado: tags=machine:s390-ccw-virtio
> +        """
> +        self.kernel_init()
> +        self.vm.launch()
> +        self.wait_until_booted()
> +
> +        self.system_init()
> +        res = self.vm.qmp('query-s390x-cpu-polarization')
> +        self.assertEqual(res['return']['polarization'], 'horizontal')
> +        self.check_topology(0, 0, 0, 0, 'medium', False)
> +
> +        self.guest_set_dispatching('1');
> +        res = self.vm.qmp('query-s390x-cpu-polarization')
> +        self.assertEqual(res['return']['polarization'], 'vertical')
> +        self.check_topology(0, 0, 0, 0, 'medium', False)
> +
> +        self.guest_set_dispatching('0');
> +        res = self.vm.qmp('query-s390x-cpu-polarization')
> +        self.assertEqual(res['return']['polarization'], 'horizontal')
> +        self.check_topology(0, 0, 0, 0, 'medium', False)

Anyway:
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-07  9:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-01 15:57 [PATCH v22 00/20] s390x: CPU Topology Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-01 15:57 ` [PATCH v22 01/20] CPU topology: extend with s390 specifics Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-05  9:01   ` Thomas Huth
2023-09-01 15:57 ` [PATCH v22 02/20] s390x/cpu topology: add topology entries on CPU hotplug Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-05 12:28   ` Thomas Huth
2023-09-01 15:57 ` [PATCH v22 03/20] target/s390x/cpu topology: handle STSI(15) and build the SYSIB Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-04 18:23   ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-05 13:26   ` Thomas Huth
2023-09-05 15:25     ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-06  8:21       ` Thomas Huth
2023-09-06 12:12         ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-06 14:53   ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-09-01 15:57 ` [PATCH v22 04/20] s390x/sclp: reporting the maximum nested topology entries Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-01 15:57 ` [PATCH v22 05/20] s390x/cpu topology: resetting the Topology-Change-Report Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-01 15:57 ` [PATCH v22 06/20] s390x/cpu topology: interception of PTF instruction Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-01 15:57 ` [PATCH v22 07/20] target/s390x/cpu topology: activate CPU topology Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-01 15:58 ` [PATCH v22 08/20] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: set-cpu-topology qmp command Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-06  8:56   ` Thomas Huth
2023-09-01 15:58 ` [PATCH v22 09/20] machine: adding s390 topology to query-cpu-fast Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-06  9:10   ` Thomas Huth
2023-09-01 15:58 ` [PATCH v22 10/20] machine: adding s390 topology to info hotpluggable-cpus Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-06  9:14   ` Thomas Huth
2023-09-01 15:58 ` [PATCH v22 11/20] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: CPU_POLARIZATION_CHANGE qapi event Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-01 15:58 ` [PATCH v22 12/20] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: query-cpu-polarization qmp command Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-01 15:58 ` [PATCH v22 13/20] docs/s390x/cpu topology: document s390x cpu topology Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-07  8:15   ` Thomas Huth
2023-09-01 15:58 ` [PATCH v22 14/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology core Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-04 18:44   ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-07  8:27   ` Thomas Huth
2023-09-08 14:27     ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-01 15:58 ` [PATCH v22 15/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology polarization Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-04 19:43   ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-07  9:02   ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2023-09-08 14:47     ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-01 15:58 ` [PATCH v22 16/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology entitlement tests Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-04 19:51   ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-07  9:05   ` Thomas Huth
2023-09-08 18:30     ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-01 15:58 ` [PATCH v22 17/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology test dedicated CPU Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-04 19:54   ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-07 10:08   ` Thomas Huth
2023-09-01 15:58 ` [PATCH v22 18/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology test socket full Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-01 15:58 ` [PATCH v22 19/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology dedicated errors Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-09-01 15:58 ` [PATCH v22 20/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology bad move Nina Schoetterl-Glausch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=529821b9-71f1-a137-172a-e697feaf6abd@redhat.com \
    --to=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=bleal@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=crosa@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=wainersm@redhat.com \
    --cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).