qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] i440fx-test: check firmware visibility
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 18:18:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5298CC73.6060601@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5298CB17.5050609@suse.de>

On 11/29/13 18:12, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 28.11.2013 19:18, schrieb Laszlo Ersek:
>> On 11/28/13 19:09, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - Rebased ("-display none" is the default now).
>>>
>>> - I looked into memory management prudence in qtest, and I can see that
>>>   we don't care about leaking small objects at all. (See for example
>>>   qpci_device_foreach(), which calls qpci_device_find() in a loop, and
>>>   leaks the retval every time.)
>>
>> Sorry, last sentence missing:
>> "Which is why I didn't try to plug such leaks in my series."
> 
> Laszlo,
> 
>> NB: If I don't get feedback for this, I'm dropping it.
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/240173/focus=241207
> 
> If you're specifically waiting on my review, being the only one CC'ed,
> you'll need to be more patient as other series have been waiting longer
> on me.
> 
> Sorry,
> Andreas

I included the reference to show that I'm doing this in response to your
request. It's not something I'd have invested time in on my own behalf.
(Especially not three rounds.)

Review-wise, I'm fine with any review that gets the series merged and
the burden off my shoulder. There are patches where I feel I need advice
or sanity checking, this series is not one of them.

> P.S. Hope you're feeling better since KVM Forum. :)

My health is better, thank you very much for asking!

Cheers,
Laszlo

      reply	other threads:[~2013-11-29 17:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-28 18:09 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] i440fx-test: check firmware visibility Laszlo Ersek
2013-11-28 18:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] i440fx-test: qtest_start() should be paired with qtest_end() Laszlo Ersek
2013-11-29 13:23   ` Markus Armbruster
2013-11-28 18:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] i440fx-test: give each GTest case its own qtest Laszlo Ersek
2013-11-29 14:53   ` Eduardo Habkost
2013-11-29 15:35     ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-11-28 18:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] i440fx-test: generate temporary firmware blob Laszlo Ersek
2013-11-29 13:57   ` Markus Armbruster
2013-11-29 15:07     ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-11-29 16:26       ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-12-02  9:28       ` Markus Armbruster
2013-11-28 18:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] i440fx-test: verify firmware under 4G and 1M, both -bios and -pflash Laszlo Ersek
2013-11-29 14:09   ` Markus Armbruster
2013-11-29 15:30     ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-11-29 16:29       ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-28 18:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] i440fx-test: check firmware visibility Laszlo Ersek
2013-11-29 17:12   ` Andreas Färber
2013-11-29 17:18     ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5298CC73.6060601@redhat.com \
    --to=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).