From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34351)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1VnocF-0000fe-5M
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 06:58:22 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1Vnobi-0001d7-R2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 06:58:11 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53845)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1Vnobd-0001bp-6O
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 06:57:38 -0500
Message-ID: <529DC728.8050102@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 12:57:28 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1386049636.git.peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com>
	<87a9ginu92.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
In-Reply-To: <87a9ginu92.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] Add error_abort and associated
 cleanups
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: imammedo@redhat.com, Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, afaerber@suse.de

Il 03/12/2013 10:44, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
> 
> There are some _nofail functions left, but none of them can use
> error_abort.
> 
> If anything assigns to error_abort, we're probably screwed.  No bright
> idea how to prevent that at compile-time.

Isn't it always used by address?

Paolo