From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53014)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1Vozai-0003uH-Us
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 12:53:34 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1Vozad-0003R3-0r
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 12:53:28 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42438)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1Vozac-0003Qs-On
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 12:53:22 -0500
Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rB6HrMdP012879
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 12:53:22 -0500
Message-ID: <52A20F0E.8070001@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 18:53:18 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1386350580-5666-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com>
	<1386350580-5666-6-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1386350580-5666-6-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 05/19] raw: Probe required direct I/O
	alignment
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com

Il 06/12/2013 18:22, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
> @@ -1227,6 +1288,7 @@ static BlockDriver bdrv_file = {
>      .bdrv_aio_writev = raw_aio_writev,
>      .bdrv_aio_flush = raw_aio_flush,
>      .bdrv_aio_discard = raw_aio_discard,
> +    .bdrv_opt_mem_align = raw_opt_mem_align,
>  
>      .bdrv_truncate = raw_truncate,
>      .bdrv_getlength = raw_getlength,
> @@ -1582,6 +1644,7 @@ static BlockDriver bdrv_host_device = {
>      .bdrv_aio_writev	= raw_aio_writev,
>      .bdrv_aio_flush	= raw_aio_flush,
>      .bdrv_aio_discard   = hdev_aio_discard,
> +    .bdrv_opt_mem_align = raw_opt_mem_align,

Should this rather be a BlockLimits field?

Paolo