From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36313) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqBR9-0006ab-JE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 19:44:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqBR1-000107-5x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 19:44:31 -0500 Received: from mail-yh0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c01::235]:63214) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqBR1-0000zx-1a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 19:44:23 -0500 Received: by mail-yh0-f53.google.com with SMTP id b20so3350177yha.40 for ; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 16:44:22 -0800 (PST) Sender: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <52A663E3.6090907@twiddle.net> Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 16:44:19 -0800 From: Richard Henderson MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1380647845-16793-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> In-Reply-To: <1380647845-16793-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/9] target-s390 tcg improvements List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: agraf@suse.de On 10/01/2013 10:17 AM, Richard Henderson wrote: > Changes v1-v2: > * Squashed patches 1, 2, 4. The feedback from patch 1 called for a > re-ordering of the patch set to better deal with STFL, but I could > not find an ordering that worked well. I think this is probably > just as clear as 3 separate patches. > > * STFL and STIDP implementations adjusted for feedback. > > * Minor tweaks to SAM implementations. > > * Split out z9-109 hack to a separate patch. Any movement on the KVM STFLE changes? I'd rebase this set on that if I knew it was going to go in unchanged... r~