From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH rebased for-1.8] i386: pc: align gpa<->hpa on 1GB boundary (v6)
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 23:13:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52A79202.9060302@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131210210009.GA8476@redhat.com>
On 12/10/13 22:00, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 06:46:12PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 12/10/13 16:53, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>> On Di, 2013-12-10 at 16:47 +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>>> On 12/10/13 15:53, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>> If we could make a small guset visible change, it would be simpler to
>>>>>> always make the PCI hole 1GB in size; it is currently 256MB for i440FX
>>>>>> and 1.25GB for q35.
>>>>>
>>>>> Easy for i440fx.
>>>>
>>>> I think it's going to break OVMF again.
>>>
>>> Can't see a reason why it should.
>>
>> PCI enumeration in OVMF assigns resources from a window that starts
>> exactly above the end of below-4gb-memory. For example, in case of a
>> 2.5GB guest, the frame buffer bar of cirrus can be somewhere just above
>> 2.5GB.
>>
>> If you change the PCI hole in qemu so that it will start at 3GB, always,
>> then the ACPI tables exported by qemu will also advertise the big mmio
>> range starting at 3GB. OVMF will pass those tables through to the OS.
>> Accordingly, the OS will try to access the framebuffer above 3GB, but
>> OVMF has configured that bar between 2.5GB and 3GB.
>>
>> IOW, I think this proposal would undo your [PATCH v2] piix: fix 32bit
>> pci hole.
>>
>> I can of course live with whatever PCI hole as long as it is made
>> available to OVMF through an easy-to-parse fw_cfg file. Then I can sync
>> the OVMF enumeration to qemu's preference.
>>
>> The fw_cfg file "etc/pci-info" allowed me to do exactly that. But it has
>> been killed. I'd like it to be resurrected, even if SeaBIOS ignores it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Laszlo
>
> There's no PCI hole in QEMU.
> All there is, is RAM split in two chunks: below and above 4G.
I don't mind reformulating (but we've been around this track a couple of
times):
Please let OVMF know about the big MMIO range (the "split" you mention)
- that is going to be advertised via ACPI to the OS,
- in an easy to parse format over fw_cfg.
Gerd's patch that I mentioned above doesn't do this. It restores peace
between the ACPI advertisment produced by qemu and between OVMF's
enumeration by duplicating logic that OVMF does ahead of enumeration. If
you change that qemu code, then OVMF will either have to duplicate the
new qemu code, or it will need to understand the boundaries of the split
from an easy-to-parse fw_cfg file.
Thanks
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-10 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-25 17:43 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH rebased for-1.8] i386: pc: align gpa<->hpa on 1GB boundary (v6) Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-25 20:58 ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-11-25 21:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-11-25 23:09 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-11-26 9:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-28 10:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-12-10 13:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-12-10 14:53 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2013-12-10 14:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-12-10 15:36 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2013-12-10 15:47 ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-12-10 15:53 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2013-12-10 17:46 ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-12-10 17:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-12-10 21:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-12-10 22:13 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2013-12-10 22:15 ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-12-10 23:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-12-11 8:00 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2013-12-10 15:05 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-12-10 17:21 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-12-10 21:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-12-11 13:41 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-12-11 14:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-12-11 14:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-12-11 15:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-12-11 15:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-12-11 15:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-12-11 15:45 ` Igor Mammedov
2013-12-11 15:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-12-11 17:26 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-12-10 16:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52A79202.9060302@redhat.com \
--to=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).