From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56499) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqjpQ-0002b1-ST for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 08:28:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqjpI-0002Vc-EQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 08:27:52 -0500 Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <52A86847.8060209@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:27:35 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1386768216-33686-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <1386768216-33686-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] roms: Flush icache when writing roms to guest memory List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: "Bogdan.Vlad@freescale.com" , QEMU Developers , "qemu-ppc@nongnu.org" , "Varun.Sethi@freescale.com" , Scott Wood , "mihai.caraman@freescale.com" Il 11/12/2013 14:23, Alexander Graf ha scritto: > + if (kvm_enabled()) { > + /* > + * The guest may want to directly execute from the rom region, > + * so we better invalidate its icache > + */ > + flush_icache_range((uintptr_t)ptr, (uintptr_t)ptr + l); > + } Shouldn't KVM itself do that when a memslot is registered? There should be no reason for non-TCG QEMU to flush the icache. Paolo