From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54580) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VsVO0-0007a6-2N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 05:26:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VsVNs-0002lc-J7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 05:26:51 -0500 Message-ID: <52AED555.1040105@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:26:29 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1387038700-9264-1-git-send-email-pl@kamp.de> In-Reply-To: <1387038700-9264-1-git-send-email-pl@kamp.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/iscsi: use a bh to schedule co reentrance List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Lieven Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-stable@nongnu.org, ronniesahlberg@gmail.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws Il 14/12/2013 17:31, Peter Lieven ha scritto: > this fixes a potential segfault and performance regression. > > If the coroutine is reentered directly in the iscsi_co_generic_cb > iscsi_process_{read,write} are interrupted and reentered any > time later. One the one hand this could happen after an iscsi_close > where the iscsi context is already gone (segfault). On the > other hand this limits the number of processed callbacks > in each aio_dispatch to one (potential performance regression). > > Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org > Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven > --- > block/iscsi.c | 11 ++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/block/iscsi.c b/block/iscsi.c > index fa69408..b0e6eea 100644 > --- a/block/iscsi.c > +++ b/block/iscsi.c > @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ typedef struct IscsiTask { > int do_retry; > struct scsi_task *task; > Coroutine *co; > + QEMUBH *bh; > } IscsiTask; > > typedef struct IscsiAIOCB { > @@ -123,6 +124,13 @@ iscsi_schedule_bh(IscsiAIOCB *acb) > qemu_bh_schedule(acb->bh); > } > > +static void iscsi_co_generic_bh_cb(void *opaque) > +{ > + struct IscsiTask *iTask = opaque; > + qemu_bh_delete(iTask->bh); > + qemu_coroutine_enter(iTask->co, NULL); > +} > + > static void > iscsi_co_generic_cb(struct iscsi_context *iscsi, int status, > void *command_data, void *opaque) > @@ -147,7 +155,8 @@ iscsi_co_generic_cb(struct iscsi_context *iscsi, int status, > > out: > if (iTask->co) { > - qemu_coroutine_enter(iTask->co, NULL); > + iTask->bh = qemu_bh_new(iscsi_co_generic_bh_cb, iTask); > + qemu_bh_schedule(iTask->bh); > } > } > > Applied to scsi-next branch, thanks. Paolo