From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59698)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tommusta@gmail.com>) id 1Vsa4C-0002PF-GY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:26:50 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tommusta@gmail.com>) id 1Vsa46-00006C-L1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:26:44 -0500
Message-ID: <52AF1BAB.3080808@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 09:26:35 -0600
From: Tom Musta <tommusta@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1386604035-2507-1-git-send-email-tommusta@gmail.com>
	<1386604035-2507-10-git-send-email-tommusta@gmail.com>
	<CAFEAcA_s_pbb9Bsmu4aoYO9wZx4Mma_BvCHGU8=g2ST8x+FGiQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<52AF1A3B.4060806@gmail.com>
	<CAFEAcA-rCy=6e0L4DjzAPOJruE_0WCHdqtvOEWb2Xs-a-Yu9Cg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA-rCy=6e0L4DjzAPOJruE_0WCHdqtvOEWb2Xs-a-Yu9Cg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 09/18] softfloat: Fix Handling of Small
 Negatives in float64_to_uint64
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: "qemu-ppc@nongnu.org" <qemu-ppc@nongnu.org>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On 12/16/2013 9:24 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 16 December 2013 15:20, Tom Musta <tommusta@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 12/12/2013 6:13 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> This function isn't in the copy of fpu/softfloat.c that's in master,
>>> unless I'm confused. Does this series depend on something else?
> 
> 
>> Peter:  Yes, it does.  See
>> http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-11/msg00045.html
>> and specifically patch 1/19.
> 
> OK. Please could you fold this bugfix directly into that patch?
> It's very hard to review "this is broken and then this thing
> fixes it", especially if the two patches are in different
> series -- much easier to just have one patch which implements
> the fixed version.
> 
> thanks
> -- PMM
> 

Yes, I will do that.  Thanks, Peter.