From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Gal Hammer <gal@redhat.com>
Cc: Gal Hammer <ghammer@redhat.com>,
qemu-stable@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] piix: do not reset APIC base address (0x80) on piix4_reset.
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:19:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52B1AEDF.8050109@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42164188.5113689.1386759897161.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
Il 11/12/2013 12:04, Gal Hammer ha scritto:
> Michael,
>
> True, I haven't figure it out yet, but the current status is that recover from sleep doesn't work.
>
> As far as I can tell it could be either:
>
> 1. piix4_reset shouldn't be call on resume.
> 2. memory_region_set_enabled (called in pm_io_space_update) shouldn't use config[0x80].
> 3. the config[0x80] shouldn't be zero in piix4_reset (current solution).
> 4. something else?
>
> I'm not well familiar with the PIIX4 emulation and your help will be appreciated.
The datasheet says that config[0x80] is reset to 0.
The PIIX spec says that during S3 the chipset provides "Shadow registers
for standard AT write only registers to save and restore system state
information" These are just for the 825x (DMA controller, PIC, PIT).
We do not emulate them and our BIOS does not support them.
I was told that a few memory controller registers survive S3, which in
our case would be the i440FX's PAM registers, but I don't think this
register should be one of them.
What guest is breaking and how? Does the guest usually initialize this
register, or does the firmware (SeaBIOS) do that? If the latter, this
could be a SeaBIOS bug instead.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-18 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-11 9:21 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] piix: do not reset APIC base address (0x80) on piix4_reset Gal Hammer
2013-12-11 10:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-12-11 10:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-12-11 11:04 ` Gal Hammer
2013-12-18 14:19 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-12-18 15:16 ` Gal Hammer
2013-12-18 21:57 ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-12-18 14:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-12-18 15:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-12-18 16:27 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2013-12-18 16:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-12-18 16:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-12-18 16:55 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2013-12-18 17:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-12-19 16:06 ` Kevin O'Connor
2013-12-19 18:03 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2013-12-19 18:17 ` Kevin O'Connor
2013-12-18 16:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-12-18 22:10 ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-12-18 22:16 ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-12-18 23:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-12-18 16:49 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2013-12-18 17:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-12-19 9:37 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2013-12-19 9:49 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2013-12-19 10:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-12-18 15:59 ` Gal Hammer
2013-12-18 16:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52B1AEDF.8050109@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=gal@redhat.com \
--cc=ghammer@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).