From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33082) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VtJ5j-0006U7-HT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:31:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VtJ5b-0005sa-4Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:31:19 -0500 Message-ID: <52B1BFBA.4050700@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 09:31:06 -0600 From: Tom Musta MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1383312955-2607-1-git-send-email-tommusta@gmail.com> <1383312955-2607-2-git-send-email-tommusta@gmail.com> <4213554E-82D9-4563-A95D-CAC96E85F710@suse.de> <52B1AF81.6040600@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH V3 01/19] Fix float64_to_uint64 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: "qemu-ppc@nongnu.org list:PowerPC" , Alexander Graf , QEMU Developers On 12/18/2013 8:35 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 18 December 2013 14:21, Tom Musta wrote >> So it would seem to make the most sense to go back and do what I had done >> originally -- separate the softfloat fixes into their own patch set and >> make the VSX and P7 patches dependent on those. Agree? > > Yeah, that works. But really what I need is to not have "patch 1 > adds function X; patch 2 fixes a bug that was introduced in patch 1". > I don't so much care whether the softfloat patches are a freestanding > set or a part of a PPC series, as long as the patches themselves are > in a reviewable state. > > thanks > -- PMM > OK .... makes sense. I will fold the bug fix back into this series and re-publish.