From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33405)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1Vv4yT-0007DP-T3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 07:51:18 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1Vv4yL-0002K8-Fr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 07:51:09 -0500
Received: from mail-ee0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c00::234]:50667)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1Vv4yL-0002K3-83
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 07:51:01 -0500
Received: by mail-ee0-f52.google.com with SMTP id d17so2288620eek.25
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 04:50:59 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <52B831AC.8030207@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 13:50:52 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20131223115622.GA6490@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA-=9j86Eo8sjtBojuQti=ti9_o5CjZO+QAONye5ZjuXRw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA-=9j86Eo8sjtBojuQti=ti9_o5CjZO+QAONye5ZjuXRw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-arm: fix build on fedora
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: John Rigby <john.rigby@linaro.org>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>

Il 23/12/2013 13:37, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
> At a minimum, if we take this approach we should add TODO comments
> to the effect that the NULL terminator and the if() can be removed
> when the first real AArch64 CPU is added.
> 
> I think I'd rather put the if (!info->name) continue into the function
> which is doing the looping over the array.

Or just change the termination condition from a check on the array size
to one on info->name.

Paolo