From: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: John Rigby <john.rigby@linaro.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-arm: fix build on fedora
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 14:32:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52B83B87.8020404@weilnetz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_ELGd89NejBg1j2RAuuxzGvgxESgc1knXMxvSnv1xPYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Am 23.12.2013 13:59, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 23 December 2013 12:50, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Il 23/12/2013 13:37, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
>>> At a minimum, if we take this approach we should add TODO comments
>>> to the effect that the NULL terminator and the if() can be removed
>>> when the first real AArch64 CPU is added.
>>>
>>> I think I'd rather put the if (!info->name) continue into the function
>>> which is doing the looping over the array.
>> Or just change the termination condition from a check on the array size
>> to one on info->name.
> That would take it out of line with the equivalent 32 bit ARM code
> (and also moxie and openrisc for what little that's worth) and be
> fractionally more tedious to revert later.
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
What about adding a dummy CPU (which can be removed later)?
I also got a warning here when I used cgcc / smatch recently, but did
not send a patch because there are too many possible fixes and none of
them seemed to be elegant :-)
Nevertheless, here is one of them:
--- a/target-arm/cpu64.c
+++ b/target-arm/cpu64.c
@@ -46,6 +46,11 @@ static void aarch64_any_initfn(Object *obj)
set_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_V7MP);
set_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64);
}
+#else
+static void aarch64_dummy_initfn(Object *obj)
+{
+ hw_error("Dummy CPU not supported");
+}
#endif
typedef struct ARMCPUInfo {
@@ -57,6 +62,9 @@ typedef struct ARMCPUInfo {
static const ARMCPUInfo aarch64_cpus[] = {
#ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
{ .name = "any", .initfn = aarch64_any_initfn },
+#else
+ /* TODO: Dummy CPU to avoid empty array. Fix when a real CPU is
added. */
+ { .name = "dummy", .initfn = aarch64_dummy_initfn },
#endif
};
Of course, any other fix is also okay.
Cheers and Merry Christmas
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-23 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-23 11:56 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-arm: fix build on fedora Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-12-23 12:37 ` Peter Maydell
2013-12-23 12:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-12-23 12:59 ` Peter Maydell
2013-12-23 13:32 ` Stefan Weil [this message]
2013-12-23 13:41 ` Peter Maydell
2013-12-23 14:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-12-23 14:15 ` Peter Maydell
2013-12-23 13:45 ` Andreas Färber
2013-12-23 13:56 ` Peter Maydell
2013-12-23 14:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52B83B87.8020404@weilnetz.de \
--to=sw@weilnetz.de \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=john.rigby@linaro.org \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).