From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38923)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1VxeJ8-0001bV-2k
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 09:59:14 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1VxeIz-0001Lt-Hh
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 09:59:06 -0500
Received: from mail-qc0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22e]:36960)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1VxeIz-0001Lo-DC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 09:58:57 -0500
Received: by mail-qc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id n7so10735918qcx.19
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 06:58:56 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Richard Henderson <rth7680@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <52C18A2C.4020705@twiddle.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 06:58:52 -0800
From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1388267351-31818-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
	<1388267351-31818-2-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <1388267351-31818-2-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/10] target-arm: A64: Add support for
 dumping AArch64 VFP register state
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: patches@linaro.org, Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Claudio Fontana <claudio.fontana@linaro.org>, Dirk Mueller <dmueller@suse.de>, Will Newton <will.newton@linaro.org>, Laurent Desnogues <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alex_Benn=E9e?= <alex.bennee@linaro.org>, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

On 12/28/2013 01:49 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> +            uint64_t vlo = float64_val(env->vfp.regs[i * 2]);
> +            uint64_t vhi = float64_val(env->vfp.regs[(i * 2) + 1]);
> +            cpu_fprintf(f, "q%02d.0=%016" PRIx64 ":%016" PRIx64 " ",
> +                        i, vlo, vhi);

Why print them lo:hi instead of, what would seem to me, the more natural hi:lo.

And what's that .0 qualifier doing on the end of an integer print field?



r~