From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33471) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W01K5-0001Ch-9n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2014 22:57:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W01Jz-0005RP-Am for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2014 22:57:53 -0500 Received: from [222.73.24.84] (port=33076 helo=song.cn.fujitsu.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W01Jy-0005Qo-Vh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2014 22:57:47 -0500 Message-ID: <52CA2922.1010308@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 11:55:14 +0800 From: Li Guang MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1388640940-12782-1-git-send-email-lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <52C52170.1040904@redhat.com> <52C5588B.30804@redhat.com> <52C9FE6B.4050408@cn.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <52C9FE6B.4050408@cn.fujitsu.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/misc/blob-loader: add a generic blob loader List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Peter Maydell , Peter Crosthwaite , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" Li Guang wrote: > Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 02/01/2014 11:51, Peter Crosthwaite ha scritto: >>>>> No, please use "realize" and avoid init. This way you can use an >>>>> Error* >>>>> to report the error. >>>>> >>>>> Also, the actual load_image_targphys call probably should be done >>>>> in a >>>>> reset handler, not at realize time. >>>>> >>> Ok I think that settles it. The actual blobbing needs to happen at >>> reset time. Perhaps the correct approach is to do as much as possible >>> (file-path / address sanitsation etc) at realize time, then only the >>> actual blob load happens at reset. Going on what Paolo said, I think >>> for this device ::init is actually a nop. >> Yeah, also because init is in fact a legacy interface to realize. >> >> Paolo >> > Ok, thanks! > > Sorry, seems load blob at reset handler can't do the right job, while the same action can play very well at init or realize. any suggestion to figure out this problem? Thanks!