From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45165) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0Ygf-0001hI-8j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 10:35:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0YgZ-0007PF-8C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 10:35:25 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34974) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0YgY-0007P0-WF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 10:35:19 -0500 Message-ID: <52CC1E6F.7070109@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 16:34:07 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20140106125410.GD3119@zion.uk.xensource.com> <20140106151154.GA10654@zion.uk.xensource.com> <52CC0614.5050402@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Project idea: make QEMU more flexible List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Peter Crosthwaite , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Wei Liu , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" , Stefano Stabellini Il 07/01/2014 16:11, Peter Maydell ha scritto: >> > So let's call things by their name and add qemu-system-xenpv that covers >> > both x86 and ARM and anything else in the future. > How is this going to work? Do you define a fake architecture > name "xenpv" ? Yes, one that aborts if a CPU is created or something like that. Paolo