From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50388)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>) id 1W0nZX-0002c5-IN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 02:29:09 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>) id 1W0nZR-0004oK-JY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 02:29:03 -0500
Received: from [222.73.24.84] (port=51592 helo=song.cn.fujitsu.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>) id 1W0nZR-0004mM-90
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 02:28:57 -0500
Message-ID: <52CCFDEE.6080808@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 15:27:42 +0800
From: Li Guang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1388654332-10303-1-git-send-email-b.galvani@gmail.com>	<1388654332-10303-3-git-send-email-b.galvani@gmail.com>	<52C9FD8E.5040200@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<20140106135643.GA4400@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140106135643.GA4400@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] hw/arm/allwinner-a10: initialize EMAC
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Beniamino Galvani <b.galvani@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Beniamino Galvani wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 08:49:18AM +0800, Li Guang wrote:
>    
>> Hi,
>> please use prefix AwA10 for names instead of Aw,
>> also PATCH 1/2.
>>      
> Hi,
>
> I agree with you that there is an inconsistency in the naming of EMAC
> and other A10 devices (timer, interrupt controller).
>
> But the EMAC core is used not only on the A10; since it can be found
> on other SoC of the Allwinner family, shouldn't the name be generic so
> that it can be reused more easily in the future by other SoC
> implementations?
>
>    

logic is:
we emulated devices in A10, then when emulate other chips
with same devices can freely use them.

Thanks!