Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/5] -object/object-add support custom location and 2nd stage initialization

["Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>]

Am 08.01.2014 17:24, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 08/01/2014 17:09, Igor Mammedov ha scritto:
>> Adds optional interfaces that objects could implement if
>> they need to:
>>   1. perform an additional initialization after object properties are set
>>   2. be placed not in '/objects' container
>>
>> Series depends on 2 PULL requests in flight from Andreas & Luiz
>> with fixes for QOM interfaces and object-add monitor/QMP command.
>> Git tree for testing:
>>   https://github.com/imammedo/qemu/commits/extend-object-add
>>
>> Igor Mammedov (5):
>>   object_add: consolidate error handling
>>   add optional 2nd stage initialization to
>>     -object/object-add/object_add commands
>>   virtio_rng: use object_realize interface instead of calling backend
>>     API
>>   vl.c: -object: handle duplicate 'id' properly
>>   -object/object-add: use custom default object location if provided
>>
>>  backends/rng.c                  |   17 ++++++-
>>  hw/virtio/virtio-rng.c          |   15 ++++---
>>  include/qom/object_interfaces.h |   96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  include/sysemu/rng.h            |   11 -----
>>  qmp.c                           |   30 +++++++++---
>>  qom/Makefile.objs               |    1 +
>>  qom/object_interfaces.c         |   57 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  vl.c                            |   21 ++++++++-
>>  8 files changed, 220 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 include/qom/object_interfaces.h
>>  create mode 100644 qom/object_interfaces.c
>>
> 
> Thanks Igor!  I like very much patches 1-4 (though I'm thinking that we
> need some style conventions for interfaces).  I think patch 5 adds more
> complexity than we need, but I'm open to discussion.

Hm, I have doubts about the use of "realize" here. So far that is only
implemented for devices, patches for bus still pending my review, and
for those we don't want that  to be handled by -object or object-add but
recursive realization as part of machine initialization, allowing
interaction via qom-set before. It that's different for backends, can we
maybe pick a name different from "realize"?

Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg