From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57718)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1W3Pcy-0002uh-OB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 07:31:30 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1W3Pcr-0007yl-QI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 07:31:24 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:31826)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1W3Pcr-0007yS-Hy
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 07:31:17 -0500
Message-ID: <52D67F7F.9030709@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 13:30:55 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1389775713-996-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com>
	<1389775713-996-7-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA_-2UdnUxhrge8s3qQSQMBZEYc3R3TGGZ6KANy+WSsu5w@mail.gmail.com>
	<52D6775B.9000704@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA9O0UTOsG5-K1PtjcBxqL_Sic76h_W4bvF__CW3TA_s2w@mail.gmail.com>
	<54FD93F5-AA4D-4787-8B60-05FD49BC2B5C@alex.org.uk>
	<52D67AB2.70801@redhat.com>
	<E23A8D63-0F9D-4C06-982A-D717961294D5@alex.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <E23A8D63-0F9D-4C06-982A-D717961294D5@alex.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v16 6/9] module: implement module loading
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>, Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin@redhat.com>, =?UTF-8?B?TGx1w61zIFZpbGFub3Zh?= <vilanova@ac.upc.edu>, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>

Il 15/01/2014 13:18, Alex Bligh ha scritto:
> I phrased that badly. I meant same output for the same calling convention, so
> surely just replacing 'sha256sum' with 'shasum -a 256' is going to work fine on
> all systems?

I don't think all systems are guaranteed to have shasum.  If we use
SHA-1, and just look for the three binaries sha1sum/sha1/shasum, we
don't have to bother about arguments and only add 10 lines or so to
configure.

Paolo