From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47108) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5DUQ-0000Hm-Hj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 06:58:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5DUK-0005qI-IW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 06:58:02 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41371) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5DUK-0005q9-Ap for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 06:57:56 -0500 Message-ID: <52DD0F3E.5010903@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:57:50 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20140110171311.02e71f62@nial.usersys.redhat.com> <20140117211015.GB18752@ERROL.INI.CMU.EDU> <20140120115850.GA29985@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20140120115850.GA29985@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: ACPI, HPET._CRS, MacOSX vs. WinXP List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: imammedo@redhat.com, "Gabriel L. Somlo" , lersek@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, agraf@suse.de Il 20/01/2014 12:58, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: > I think at this point I agree. > > I think the hack looking for the SMC device is safer than _OSI: OSPMs > are known to do crazy things when they see _OSI, such as assuming they > need to try and emulate the OS probed. Source? Paolo