From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38927)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1W5YRa-0000Ah-Cl
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 05:20:37 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1W5YRT-00051Z-4W
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 05:20:30 -0500
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:52505 helo=mx2.suse.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1W5YRS-00051U-T8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 05:20:23 -0500
Message-ID: <52DE49E3.9000507@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 11:20:19 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1390236074-21533-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com>
	<20140120183656.GF24353@otherpad.lan.raisama.net>
	<20140120203923.GD14528@redhat.com> <52DE4607.5070206@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <52DE4607.5070206@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7 RESEND] target-i386: Simplify
 kvm_cpu_fill_host() and kvm_check_features_against_host()
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>

Am 21.01.2014 11:03, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 20/01/2014 21:39, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>>>>>> Resend of series submitted on 24 November 2013, that didn't get an=
y reply. Only
>>>>>> change is a trivial conflict on patch 7/7.
>>>>
>>>> Question: which tree is the most appropriate to get this in? qom-cpu=
?
>>>> kvm?
>> Either kvm or my pc tree.
>> Seems unrelated to qom.
>> Paolo - want to review and take this?
>>
>=20
> Yup, will include in the next uq/master pull request.

Thanks!

Andreas

--=20
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe=
rg