From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43880) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W6MTW-00037x-Kv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 10:45:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W6MTQ-0005hc-LI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 10:45:50 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:43349 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W6MTQ-0005h8-Ei for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 10:45:44 -0500 Message-ID: <52E13925.5000506@suse.de> Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 16:45:41 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1389360699-9183-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <1389360699-9183-2-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <87ppo0rm11.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <52D000DF.60600@suse.de> <52E12A16.1020705@suse.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] qom-test: Run for all available machines List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: QEMU Developers , Markus Armbruster , Alexander Graf Am 23.01.2014 16:40, schrieb Peter Maydell: > On 23 January 2014 14:41, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: >> As indicated on IRC, I want to get those fixed before transforming one >> notation to another. Especially this patch is throwing them all in one >> bucket dropping any annotation hinting at why and how it may be fixed. >=20 > Would you accept a version where every item on the black list > had a comment describing why it was there and what the required > fix is? I think this patch is a vast improvement on the current > whitelist setup and we shouldn't block it waiting for every > obscure target to get fixed. Like I said, I have already sent a patch for PReP, which Alex has queued. The intent is to rebase this series on it, obsoleting part of the blacklist. I have also now sent out a patch covering Macs and e500. So the answer is, I will accept a patch that has a reasonably small blacklist. The time you're arguing about this on IRC and here you could've spent actually helping investigate and fixing this... Even if I queued it and sent a pull, it would take days or weeks to go in, so I really don't see why I should rush this series into my tree. Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=BC= rnberg