From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50850) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W7DF3-0003Ss-HL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 19:06:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W7DEx-0005fH-ID for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 19:06:25 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:55226 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W7DEx-0005fD-BK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 19:06:19 -0500 Message-ID: <52E45174.20701@suse.de> Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 01:06:12 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1389781375-11774-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> <1389781375-11774-11-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> <52D946E4.7030708@suse.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 10/42] qtest: Fix the bug about disable vnc causes "make check" fail List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kewei Yu Cc: Kevin Wolf , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" , anthony@codemonkey.ws Am 18.01.2014 12:54, schrieb Kewei Yu: >=20 > 2014/1/17 Andreas F=C3=A4rber > >=20 > Am 15.01.2014 11:22, schrieb Kevin Wolf: > > From: Kewei Yu > > > > > When we disable vnc from "./configure", QEMU can't use the vnc op= tion. > > So qtest can't use the "vnc -none ", otherwise "make check" fails= . > > If QEMU uses "-display none", "-vnc none" is excrescent, So we > just need to drop it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kewei Yu > > > Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini > > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf > >=20 > If the pull does get respun, 'Fix "make check" failing for > --disable-vnc' would be better English. ;) >=20 > Yes, It is more accurate. So.... I should re-submit it? Sorry for the late answer. Since it was already in the maintainer's queue and just about the commit message, it's not necessary for you to resubmit, my comment was addressed to Kevin. When a "PULL" has been sent, only major reasons (like build breakages, missing/wrong Sob, etc.) lead to a resubmission by the maintainer. Apart from the grammar issues ("causes ... to fail" or "... failure", "disabling ... causes"), please keep in mind that many commits fix bugs, so it will be more useful to the reader of patch/commit to read prominently what is changing (and why) to determine whether he/she is affected. Hope that explains. Regards, Andreas >=20 >=20 > Andreas >=20 > -- > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germa= ny > GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG= N=C3=BCrnberg >=20 > Kewei --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=BC= rnberg