From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56717) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9FlM-0001Y7-WD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 10:12:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9FlF-0006wV-OC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 10:12:12 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43136) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9FlF-0006wJ-Fp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 10:12:05 -0500 Message-ID: <52EBBD3E.5060600@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 16:11:58 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1391111339-6958-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> <20140131154853.34c41154@thinkpad> <20140131151024.GX2221@otherpad.lan.raisama.net> In-Reply-To: <20140131151024.GX2221@otherpad.lan.raisama.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [uq/master PATCH 0/7] x86 CPU subclasses, take 7 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eduardo Habkost , Igor Mammedov Cc: luiz@otherpad.lan.raisama.net, kvm@vger.kernel.org, libvir-list@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Jiri Denemark , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= Il 31/01/2014 16:10, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto: > I don't mind which command is used, as long as we have the same effect. > I used object-add in my example because device_add rejects the CPU > classes by now (because they have cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet=true). > > But now I have one question: how can people know which parts of the QMP > semantics will be stable, and which parts are subject to change? object-add was added in 2.0, so it was never stable. Paolo