From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44848) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAdZn-0000ya-At for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 05:50:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAdZi-0005p9-EI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 05:49:59 -0500 Message-ID: <52F0C5C4.80102@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 11:49:40 +0100 From: Laszlo Ersek MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1391492590-8844-1-git-send-email-sw@weilnetz.de> In-Reply-To: <1391492590-8844-1-git-send-email-sw@weilnetz.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] misc: Fix case Qemu -> QEMU List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Weil Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 02/04/14 06:43, Stefan Weil wrote: > Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil > --- > scripts/switch-timer-api | 2 +- > tests/i440fx-test.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/scripts/switch-timer-api b/scripts/switch-timer-api > index a369a08..b0e230b 100755 > --- a/scripts/switch-timer-api > +++ b/scripts/switch-timer-api > @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ sub Syntax > print STDERR < Usage: $FindBin::Script [options] FILE ... > > -Translate each FILE to the new Qemu timer API. If no files > +Translate each FILE to the new QEMU timer API. If no files > are passed, a reasonable guess is taken. > > Options: > diff --git a/tests/i440fx-test.c b/tests/i440fx-test.c > index fa3e3d6..bcd2181 100644 > --- a/tests/i440fx-test.c > +++ b/tests/i440fx-test.c > @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static void test_i440fx_firmware(FirmwareTestFixture *fixture, > qtest_start(cmdline); > g_free(cmdline); > > - /* Qemu has loaded the firmware (because qtest_start() only returns after > + /* QEMU has loaded the firmware (because qtest_start() only returns after > * the QMP handshake completes). We must unlink the firmware blob right > * here, because any assertion firing below would leak it in the > * filesystem. This is also the reason why we recreate the blob every time > (I'm fine both ways.) Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek