From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56367)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1WCcbw-0003X2-1b
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 17:12:29 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1WCcbn-0001nX-43
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 17:12:23 -0500
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:58356 helo=mx2.suse.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1WCcbm-0001n4-Ti
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 17:12:15 -0500
Message-ID: <52F7FD38.6090704@suse.de>
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 23:12:08 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1375478221-22722-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de>	<20130806084837.GA5268@igalia.com>	<52F68C6B.2080908@suse.de>
	<52F6BE62.6070503@redhat.com> <52F7F3B5.5030101@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <52F7F3B5.5030101@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-next for-next 0/6] QOM realize for
	IndustryPack
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Alberto Garcia <agarcia@igalia.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>

Am 09.02.2014 22:31, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 09/02/2014 00:31, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
>>
>>> The other issue was that while the ipoctal232 device is right in
>>> hw/char/, tpci200.c and ipack.[hc] have nothing to do with char devic=
es
>>> - therefore this patch proposed hw/ipack/, matching drivers/ipack/ in
>>> Linux.
>>
>> It's okay, but I think I asked what other IPack modules exist and I ha=
d
>> no answer.
>=20
> I found more IPack here:
> http://www.acromag.com/catalog/84/Embedded_I_O_Boards/Industry_Pack_I_O=
_Modules
>=20
>=20
> so hw/ipack is fine.

Okay, so applying the original patch after all:

https://github.com/afaerber/qemu-cpu/commits/qom-next

Another old branch gone. :)

Cheers,
Andreas

--=20
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe=
rg