From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41761) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WD3FS-0004rb-Mz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 21:39:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WD3FJ-0004FK-Ep for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 21:38:58 -0500 Received: from [222.73.24.84] (port=27380 helo=song.cn.fujitsu.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WD3FJ-0004EI-2q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 21:38:49 -0500 Message-ID: <52F98CE7.6020405@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:37:27 +0800 From: Qiao Nuohan MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1390890126-17377-1-git-send-email-qiaonuohan@cn.fujitsu.com> <1390890126-17377-14-git-send-email-qiaonuohan@cn.fujitsu.com> <20140210141048.796e9c91@redhat.com> <52F94C84.20105@redhat.com> <52F95C46.3030701@redhat.com> <52F9611D.7000808@redhat.com> <52F9620D.5040204@redhat.com> <52F96D56.7040306@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <52F96D56.7040306@redhat.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 13/13] dump: add 'query-dump-guest-memory-capability' command List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Laszlo Ersek , Paolo Bonzini , Luiz Capitulino , Eric Blake Cc: stefanha@gmail.com, kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, afaerber@suse.de, anderson@redhat.com On 02/11/2014 08:22 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 02/11/14 00:34, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >> Luiz, can you apply patches 1-12 for now? I agree with Laszlo that, no >> matter how unfortunate this is, the "unused" warnings are a necessary >> evil and one that can be worked around easily when bisecting. > > Thanks, Paolo! > > In addition, Luiz, please consider applying Ekaterina's v3 patch on top > of Qiao's v8 12/13 (since v8 13/13 is being postponed). Ekaterina's > patch doesn't depend on v8 13/13 and it extends the feature to s390x. This is a good strategy to me. And thanks to Paolo, your suggestion on 13/13 is better, but I want to check whether Eric has some comments on it. > > Thanks, > Laszlo > > -- Regards Qiao Nuohan