From: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: Orit Wasserman <owasserm@redhat.com>, Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Dave Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] memory allocation of migration changed?
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:30:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52FA6C5E.1060300@profihost.ag> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJSP0QWyA195Pdhy_juSimfnuPFTakwcHtN2beyJdE31ghgemQ@mail.gmail.com>
Am 11.02.2014 16:44, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
> <s.priebe@profihost.ag> wrote:
>> in the past (Qemu 1.5) a migration failed if there was not enogh memory
>> on the target host available directly at the beginning.
>>
>> Now with Qemu 1.7 i've seen succeeded migrations but the kernel OOM
>> memory killer killing qemu processes. So the migration seems to takes
>> place without having anough memory on the target machine?
>
> How much memory is the guest configured with? How much memory does
> the host have?
Guest: 48GB
Host: 192GB
> I wonder if there are zero pages that can be migrated almost "for
> free" and the destination host doesn't touch. When they are touched
> for the first time after migration handover, they need to be allocated
> on the destination host. This can lead to OOM if you overcommitted
> memory.
In the past the migration failed immediatly with exit code 255.
> Can you reproduce the OOM reliably? It should be possible to debug it
> and figure out whether it's just bad luck or a true regression.
So there is no known patch changing this behaviour?
What is about those?
fc1c4a5d32e15a4c40c47945da85ef9c1e0c1b54
211ea74022f51164a7729030b28eec90b6c99a08
f1c72795af573b24a7da5eb52375c9aba8a37972
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-11 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-11 14:54 [Qemu-devel] memory allocation of migration changed? Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2014-02-11 15:44 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-02-11 16:22 ` Peter Lieven
2014-02-11 18:32 ` Stefan Priebe
2014-02-14 14:59 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-02-14 18:15 ` Stefan Priebe
2014-02-11 18:30 ` Stefan Priebe [this message]
2014-02-14 15:03 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-02-14 18:16 ` Stefan Priebe
2014-02-24 15:00 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-02-24 16:13 ` Eric Blake
2014-03-12 19:15 ` Stefan Priebe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52FA6C5E.1060300@profihost.ag \
--to=s.priebe@profihost.ag \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=owasserm@redhat.com \
--cc=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).