Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/8] spapr: bootindex support

[Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>]

On 01/22/2014 11:17 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 01/22/2014 09:16 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 22/01/2014 05:19, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>>> On 12/11/2013 09:22 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>>> With the great help from Paolo, I am presenting yet another try of
>>>> bootindex
>>>> support on sPAPR, this time with some QOM fixes. Details are in the
>>>> commit messages.
>>>> Please, comment. Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Alexey Kardashevskiy (5):
>>>>   boot: extend get_boot_devices_list() to ignore suffixes
>>>>   spapr-llan: add to boot device list
>>>>   spapr-vio: fix firmware names
>>>>   qdev: introduce FWPathProvider interface
>>>>   spapr: define interface to fix device pathname
>>>>
>>>> Hervé Poussineau (1):
>>>>   qom: detect bad reentrance during object_class_foreach
>>>>
>>>> Paolo Bonzini (2):
>>>>   qom: do not register interface "types" in the type table
>>>>   vl: allow customizing the class of /machine
>>>>
>>>>  hw/core/Makefile.objs         |  1 +
>>>>  hw/core/fw-path-provider.c    | 34 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  hw/core/qdev.c                | 18 +++++++++-
>>>>  hw/net/spapr_llan.c           |  3 ++
>>>>  hw/nvram/fw_cfg.c             |  2 +-
>>>>  hw/ppc/spapr.c                | 80
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>  hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c            |  2 ++
>>>>  include/hw/boards.h           |  1 +
>>>>  include/hw/fw-path-provider.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++
>>>>  include/sysemu/sysemu.h       |  2 +-
>>>>  qom/object.c                  | 17 +++++++--
>>>>  tests/Makefile                |  1 +
>>>>  vl.c                          | 11 ++++--
>>>>  13 files changed, 193 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>>  create mode 100644 hw/core/fw-path-provider.c
>>>>  create mode 100644 include/hw/fw-path-provider.h
>>>
>>>
>>> Some bits from this went upstream but none of them is mine. What am I
>>> missing here? Thanks.
>>
>> No idea, perhaps it's because the same patches were present in multiple
>> series?  Alex, are you picking up what's left?
>>
>> Paolo
> 
> 
> In the "Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] qom: detect bad reentrance during
> object_class_foreach" thread Andreas told me:
> 
> ===
> Be patient.
> 
> 1) I am on holidays and thus not available full-time.
> 2) Alex has already sent out his ppc PULL, so no urgency.
> 3) As mentioned, I plan to post QOM and CPU PULLs later today.
> 
> And no, you don't need to repost after parts of your series get applied
> pretty much unmodified.
> ===
> 
> So I wonder if I am not just patient enough :)


Nobody seems picking up the bits I am interested in from this :-/
What can I possibly do to get this in upstream?... I feel I am doing
something systematically wrong but nobody is telling me what exactly. Thanks.


-- 
Alexey