From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mft9K-0000Q9-NJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:21:10 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mft9G-0000Ph-Pa for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:21:10 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46833 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mft9G-0000Pe-KB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:21:06 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f227.google.com ([209.85.218.227]:55072) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mft9G-0001LA-6O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:21:06 -0400 Received: by bwz27 with SMTP id 27so2238711bwz.34 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:21:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <52d4a3890908250316l4de68725xa9d780e7d5b37205@mail.gmail.com> References: <48A8574B.6010704@web.de> <4A938B26.5040609@web.de> <52d4a3890908250124g74e25441x262fc7926bfdbe36@mail.gmail.com> <4A93A7EC.6090704@web.de> <52d4a3890908250209y76ecaf1tf68117635a03820d@mail.gmail.com> <4A93AFF9.1060201@web.de> <52d4a3890908250316l4de68725xa9d780e7d5b37205@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:21:04 +0300 Message-ID: <52d4a3890908250321u746e5757u136030bcbc19208d@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Breakage with local APIC routing From: Mohammed Gamal Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Avi Kivity , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Mohammed Gamal wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Mohammed Gamal wrote: >>> qemu-system-x86_64 -hda /dev/null -cdrom >>> >> >> I only have kubuntu-9.04-alternate-amd64.iso at hand ATM, and with that >> image I'm unable to reproduce. Will download and check standard ubuntu >> later today. >> >>> I was using qemu-kvm, but I assume that using -no-kvm would be >>> equivalent to using plain qemu, no? >> >> Generally yes, but not necessarily (e.g. the BIOSes are different). So >> it's better to check such issues also against "clean" qemu, specifically >> as we are on qemu-devel here. >> >> Jan >> >> > Just tested this now on a vanilla qemu, I am still able to reproduce > the same issue. > This bug might be related to the same problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/379000