From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42192) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bhO4L-0000sU-3U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 17:38:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bhO4K-0008Pu-9g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 17:38:13 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:13420) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bhO4K-0008Po-3W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 17:38:12 -0400 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8622280086 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 20:22:30 +0000 (UTC) References: <1473173750-11761-1-git-send-email-marcel@redhat.com> <5362df9c-00f8-adab-ecd2-481a33e84687@redhat.com> <20160906184921-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <41dcdc9b-ba44-3dcf-78b2-72cade130766@redhat.com> <20160906221822-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <52fc397d-bd03-e8e7-fd82-61ad278db7c3@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 22:22:26 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160906221822-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] tests/acpi: speedup acpi tests List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum , imammedo@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 06/09/2016 21:21, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 09:11:16PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> >> >> On 06/09/2016 17:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>> Just use "-machine accel=kvm:tcg" and let QEMU do the hard work. :) >>>> >>>> Paolo >>> >>> Sounds good, but we really need to skip it when gsi >>> capability is not there (and when using kernel irqchip) >>> (because in that case we can't override apic irq0). >> >> We should just remove support for !kvm_has_gsi_routing on x86. It's >> been there since November 2008. >> >> Paolo > > Fine by me. Can you post a patch that does this? > This one can be a follow-up, and we can also > drop the conditional handling from acpi-build. Go ahead and merge Marcel's patch. I can remove kernel_irqchip=off once apic irq0 override is assumed. Paolo